So I want an array with 10 volatile booleans, not a volatile array with 10 booleans. It probably does not even make sense to have a volatile array reference, correct me if I am wrong.
If it's only 10 and is always 10, you could simply write:
private volatile boolean b1, b2, ..., b10;
A possibly cleaner way would be to use an AtomicIntegerArray(10)
and map between integers and booleans (0=false, 1=true).
You should clarify the reason why you need 10 volatile booleans: there may be a better way.
I believe the only way is to have a AtomicBoolean[] or an AtomicIntegerArray. Then they do not need to be volatile. Its elements will be.
If you want more fun, check this question: Which is "better". AtomicIntegerArray (1/0 as true/false) versus AtomicBoolean[]?
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.