I'm new to multithread programming in c# .net, I need help to convert this code show bellow to Task parallel in C#.
private void thisIsMethodA()
{
//Vertical database
Dictionary<int, Bitmap> verticalDB = new Dictionary<int, Bitmap>();
// for each item
foreach (KeyValuePair<int, Bitmap> entry in verticalDB)
{
// We call the depth first search method
dfsPruning(prefix, entry.Value, frequentItems, frequentItems, entry.Key, 2);
}
}
private void dfsPruning(Prefix prefix, Bitmap prefixBitmap, List<int> sn, List<int> inl, int hasToBeGreaterThanForIStep, int m)
{
int maximumPatternLength = 100;
for (int k = 0; k < sn.Count; k++)
{
if (maximumPatternLength > m)
{
dfsPruning(prefixSStep, newBitmap, sTemp, sTemp, item, m + 1);
}
}
for (int k = 0; k < inl.Count; k++)
{
if (maximumPatternLength > m)
{
dfsPruning(prefixIStep, newBitmap, sTemp, iTemp, item, m + 1);
}
}
}
Should I use code below?
Is it Right to implement using Task?, Can you suggest me what more can I do and how can i improve the efficiency more?
private void thisIsMethodA()
{
//Vertical database
Dictionary<int, Bitmap> verticalDB = new Dictionary<int, Bitmap>();
// for each item
Parallel.ForEach(verticalDB, (entry) =>
{
// We call the depth first search method
dfsPruning(prefix, entry.Value, frequentItems, frequentItems, entry.Key, 2);
});
}
private void dfsPruning(Prefix prefix, Bitmap prefixBitmap, List<int> sn, List<int> inl, int hasToBeGreaterThanForIStep, int m)
{
int maximumPatternLength = 100;
var tasks = new List<Task>();
for (int k = 0; k < sn.Count; k++)
{
if (maximumPatternLength > m)
{
tasks.Add(Task.Factory.StartNew(() => dfsPruning(prefixSStep, newBitmap, sTemp, sTemp, item, m + 1)));
}
}
for (int k = 0; k < inl.Count; k++)
{
if (maximumPatternLength > m)
{
tasks.Add(Task.Factory.StartNew(() => dfsPruning(prefixSStep, newBitmap, sTemp, sTemp, item, m + 1)));
}
}
Task.WaitAll(tasks.ToArray());
}
So my question is, How to convert this code to Task Parallel Library. So that .net only take care to run this tasks parallel. dfsPruning() method is recursive, I need help to convert this method to task parallel.
Thank you very much for taking the time to read my letter and I look forward to anything I may receive.
One simple thing you can do is to use Parallel.ForEach
to parallelize the thisIsMethodA
rather than dfsPruning
. This will process each entry on a different thread depending on your execution environment,but you need to be careful with data being modified from different threads
private void thisIsMethodA()
{
//Vertical database
Dictionary<int, Bitmap> verticalDB = new Dictionary<int, Bitmap>();
// for each item
Parallel.ForEach (vertocalDB, (entry) =>
{
// We call the depth first search method
dfsPruning(prefix, entry.Value, frequentItems, frequentItems, entry.Key, 2);
});
}
This can be a candidate for Parallel.For
As the loop might be very recursive I recommed to set MaxDegreeOfParallelism based on your server configuration, so that there should not be task created and goes on waiting for threads or processor to release.
private void thisIsMethodA()
{
//Vertical database
Dictionary<int, Bitmap> verticalDB = new Dictionary<int, Bitmap>();
// for each item
Parallel.ForEach (vertocalDB, (entry) =>
{
// We call the depth first search method
dfsPruning(prefix, entry.Value, frequentItems, frequentItems, entry.Key, 2);
}
}
private void dfsPruning(Prefix prefix, Bitmap prefixBitmap, List<int> sn, List<int> inl, int hasToBeGreaterThanForIStep, int m)
{
int maximumPatternLength = 100;
Parallel.For(0,sn.Count, new ParallelOptions { MaxDegreeOfParallelism = 10 }, (k) =>
{
if (maximumPatternLength > m)
{
dfsPruning(prefixSStep, newBitmap, sTemp, sTemp, item, m + 1);
}
});
Parallel.For(0,inl.Count, new ParallelOptions { MaxDegreeOfParallelism = 10 }, (k) =>
{
if (maximumPatternLength > m)
{
dfsPruning(prefixIStep, newBitmap, sTemp, iTemp, item, m + 1);
}
});
}
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.