简体   繁体   中英

Hibernate postgresql notify functionality

I`m writing an app that is using hibernate + JPA as an ORM and postgresql 9.3 as a database backend and I need to react with some java code to some database events.
To be more precise I want to build an trigger that uses pg_notify() when a new row is inserted into the table.
I have read about that but all the tutorials were with a direct jdbc connection and not through hibernate.
I (think that I) cannot use hibernate events as the rows are not inserted through hibernate but by a 3rd party app.

Is there any way that I can receive notifications send with pg_notify through hibernate ?

-- update
Right now I have an classCastException :

java.lang.ClassCastException: com.sun.gjc.spi.jdbc40.ConnectionWrapper40 cannot be cast to org.postgresql.PGConnection
    at com.xxx.core.impl.dao.PostgresqlLowLevelNotificationDAOImpl$1.execute(PostgresqlLowLevelNotificationDAOImpl.java:36)
    at com.xxx.core.impl.dao.PostgresqlLowLevelNotificationDAOImpl$1.execute(PostgresqlLowLevelNotificationDAOImpl.java:1)

I have to mention that I use Glassfish 4.0 as AS. The connection pool is created on glassfish and accessed by app through jndi. Also the EntityManager is injected by the container with Spring. Here is my code:

@Named
public class PostgresqlLowLevelNotificationDAOImpl implements PostgresqlLowLevelNotificationDAO{

    @PersistenceContext(type =PersistenceContextType.TRANSACTION,synchronization=SynchronizationType.SYNCHRONIZED,unitName="CCPU")
    private EntityManager em;

@Override
public ArrayList<PGNotification> getNotifications(){

    Session session = em.unwrap(Session.class);

    PGNotification[] notifications = session.doReturningWork(new ReturningWork<PGNotification[]>() {

        @Override
        public PGNotification[] execute(Connection connection) throws SQLException {
            PGNotification[] notifications = ((PGConnection) connection).getNotifications();
            return notifications;
        }

    });

    return (ArrayList) Arrays.asList(notifications);
}   

}

-- update
I have fixed the classcast exception :

@Override
public ArrayList<PGNotification> getNotifications(){

    Session session = em.unwrap(Session.class);


    PGNotification[] notifications = session.doReturningWork(new ReturningWork<PGNotification[]>() {

        @Override
        public PGNotification[] execute(Connection connection) throws SQLException {

            PGConnection pgc = null; 

            if (connection.isWrapperFor(PGConnection.class)) {
                pgc = (PGConnection) connection.unwrap(PGConnection.class);
            }                               

            PGNotification[] notifications = pgc.getNotifications();                
            return notifications;
        }
    });

But it still seems that i do not receive the notifications.

update ---
After i have implemented solution proposed by Neil i have this error in glassfish logs when i undeploy app:

    2014-06-27T11:03:24.278+0300|SEVERE: The web application [/myApp] created a ThreadLocal    with key of type [io.netty.buffer.PooledByteBufAllocator$1] (value [io.netty.buffer.PooledByteBufAllocator$1@28ad6479]) and a value of type [io.netty.buffer.PoolThreadCache] (value [io.netty.buffer.PoolThreadCache@f9f58cc]) but failed to remove it when the web application was stopped. Threads are going to be renewed over time to try and avoid a probable memory leak.
2014-06-27T11:03:24.279+0300|SEVERE: The web application [/myApp] created a ThreadLocal with key of type [io.netty.util.Recycler$1] (value [io.netty.util.Recycler$1@267ec117]) and a value of type [io.netty.util.Recycler.Stack] (value [io.netty.util.Recycler$Stack@4bb6e0bf]) but failed to remove it when the web application was stopped. Threads are going to be renewed over time to try and avoid a probable memory leak.
2014-06-27T11:03:24.279+0300|SEVERE: The web application [/myApp] created a ThreadLocal with key of type [io.netty.util.Recycler$1] (value [io.netty.util.Recycler$1@535d426e]) and a value of type [io.netty.util.Recycler.Stack] (value [io.netty.util.Recycler$Stack@fb46e84]) but failed to remove it when the web application was stopped. Threads are going to be renewed over time to try and avoid a probable memory leak.
2014-06-27T11:03:24.280+0300|SEVERE: The web application [/myApp] created a ThreadLocal with key of type [io.netty.util.internal.ThreadLocalRandom$2] (value [io.netty.util.internal.ThreadLocalRandom$2@ec3a42a]) and a value of type [io.netty.util.internal.ThreadLocalRandom] (value [io.netty.util.internal.ThreadLocalRandom@4e4ec8f8]) but failed to remove it when the web application was stopped. Threads are going to be renewed over time to try and avoid a probable memory leak.
2014-06-27T11:03:24.280+0300|SEVERE: The web application [/myApp] created a ThreadLocal with key of type [io.netty.util.Recycler$1] (value [io.netty.util.Recycler$1@166c39f2]) and a value of type [io.netty.util.Recycler.Stack] (value [io.netty.util.Recycler$Stack@1b504a5e]) but failed to remove it when the web application was stopped. Threads are going to be renewed over time to try and avoid a probable memory leak.
2014-06-27T11:03:24.281+0300|SEVERE: The web application [/myApp] created a ThreadLocal with key of type [io.netty.util.Recycler$1] (value [io.netty.util.Recycler$1@34426f54]) and a value of type [io.netty.util.Recycler.Stack] (value [io.netty.util.Recycler$Stack@759b0e99]) but failed to remove it when the web application was stopped. Threads are going to be renewed over time to try and avoid a probable memory leak.
2014-06-27T11:03:24.282+0300|SEVERE: The web application [/myApp] created a ThreadLocal with key of type [io.netty.util.concurrent.DefaultPromise$1] (value [io.netty.util.concurrent.DefaultPromise$1@16db9b21]) and a value of type [java.lang.Integer] (value [0]) but failed to remove it when the web application was stopped. Threads are going to be renewed over time to try and avoid a probable memory leak.
2014-06-27T11:03:24.282+0300|SEVERE: The web application [/myApp] created a ThreadLocal with key of type [io.netty.util.Recycler$1] (value [io.netty.util.Recycler$1@166c39f2]) and a value of type [io.netty.util.Recycler.Stack] (value [io.netty.util.Recycler$Stack@2ba59f40]) but failed to remove it when the web application was stopped. Threads are going to be renewed over time to try and avoid a probable memory leak.
2014-06-27T11:03:24.282+0300|SEVERE: The web application [/myApp] created a ThreadLocal with key of type [io.netty.buffer.PooledByteBufAllocator$1] (value [io.netty.buffer.PooledByteBufAllocator$1@28ad6479]) and a value of type [io.netty.buffer.PoolThreadCache] (value [io.netty.buffer.PoolThreadCache@67a3923]) but failed to remove it when the web application was stopped. Threads are going to be renewed over time to try and avoid a probable memory leak.
2014-06-27T11:03:24.283+0300|SEVERE: The web application [/myApp] created a ThreadLocal with key of type [io.netty.util.Recycler$1] (value [io.netty.util.Recycler$1@166c39f2]) and a value of type [io.netty.util.Recycler.Stack] (value [io.netty.util.Recycler$Stack@423d2c27]) but failed to remove it when the web application was stopped. Threads are going to be renewed over time to try and avoid a probable memory leak.
2014-06-27T11:03:24.283+0300|SEVERE: The web application [/myApp] created a ThreadLocal with key of type [io.netty.util.Recycler$1] (value [io.netty.util.Recycler$1@535d426e]) and a value of type [io.netty.util.Recycler.Stack] (value [io.netty.util.Recycler$Stack@3e1dd66a]) but failed to remove it when the web application was stopped. Threads are going to be renewed over time to try and avoid a probable memory leak.
2014-06-27T11:03:24.283+0300|SEVERE: The web application [/myApp] created a ThreadLocal with key of type [io.netty.buffer.PooledByteBufAllocator$1] (value [io.netty.buffer.PooledByteBufAllocator$1@28ad6479]) and a value of type [io.netty.buffer.PoolThreadCache] (value [io.netty.buffer.PoolThreadCache@18e7e902]) but failed to remove it when the web application was stopped. Threads are going to be renewed over time to try and avoid a probable memory leak.

I have to mention that the destroy() method is invoked when the app is undeployed. And if I spy with visualVM the thread is still alive after the application was undeployed.

public void destroy(){

    try{
        Statement statement = pgConnection.createStatement();                  
        statement.addBatch("UNLISTEN xxxTest");
        statement.executeBatch();
        statement.close();          
    }catch(SQLException sqle)   {
        sqle.printStackTrace(); 
    }

}
  1. Why do you need Hibernate here? Just use JDBC. You probably want to fire an application-wide event anyways (perhaps to send a websocket msg or bust an ehcache), and if you need to do something w hibernate, subscribe to that event and do something with Hibernate.

  2. http://impossibl.github.io/pgjdbc-ng/ is your friend here. No polling required.

See http://blog.databasepatterns.com/2014/04/postgresql-nofify-websocket-spring-mvc.html

Hibernate doesn't have direct support for PostgreSL notifications, because this is a specific database feature that's not supported by all DB vendors and it doesn't fit into the ORM framework responsibility.

Nevertheless you could still try hooking it into your current running transaction. You need access to the current database connection do add the listening hook .

This can be done with the Session.doWork() support:

session.doWork(new Work() {
    @Override
    public void execute(Connection connection) throws SQLException {
        //add some statement if it's required
        PGNotification notifications[] = ((PGConnection) connection).getNotifications();           
    }
});

The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM