Understanding the Haskell type system in the context of applicatives

Question

I am playing with Control.Applicative and I am realizing I don't understand everything with the Haskell type system.

Here is my experiment in Ghci:

λ :t (<*>)
(<*>) :: Applicative f => f (a -> b) -> f a -> f b

λ :t (<*>) (pure 2)
(<*>) (pure 2) :: (Num (a -> b), Applicative f) => f a -> f b

The type of the first argument of <*> is f (a -> b) .

• Why is this expression correct?
• How can it be unified with (pure 2) since the constant 2 is not of type a -> b ?
• What does Num (a -> b) mean? How can a function having a a -> b type be an instance of Num ?

Answer 1

The first argument of <*> is supposed to be f (a -> b) . So given (<*>) (pure x) , this is well-typed provided that x is some kind of function.

The type of 2 is Num a => a . In other words, 2 can be any possible type , so long as it's an instance of Num .

So in your expression (<*>) (pure 2) , this is well-typed provided that the type of 2 is a function type, and that function type has a Num instance.

Of course, there is almost no reason why you would ever want a function to have a Num instance. But the compiler doesn't know that. All it's saying is that if there was such an instance, then the expression would become well-typed.

(This is similar to the error you sometimes see where the compiler wants some type to be an instance of Integral and Fractional simultaneously. To a human, this is a nonsensical combination. To a machine, they're just two ordinary classes...)