简体   繁体   中英

Any side effects of this empty list checking (list = []) in OCaml?

In OCaml, when having to check for the emptiness of a list data structure lst , I would like to use

if (lst = []) then ...

for its conciseness, instead of using pattern matching or checking length of the list.

I wonder if there is any side effect of this structural comparison (=) over the list data structure?

There are no side effects. It's a perfectly good way to test whether a list is empty.

Many times however, you'd like to work with some elements of the list if it's not empty. Pattern matching is good for those times.

As a tiny side comment, if you're interested in conciseness you don't need the parentheses in your if .

The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM