I'm testing my knowledge on Generics in Java, and I'm coming across an issue.
The code
return (t%2==0);
in my IsEven.java wont compile, as well as
int comparison = t.compareTo(memberT);
in my GreaterThan.java
I assume this is an error with how I set up the Generic typing of the class? Any additional help would be appreciated.
ArrayTester.java
import java.util.Arrays;
public class ArrayTester<T> {
private T[] myArray;
CustomTest<T> tester;
public ArrayTester(T[] tArray, CustomTest<T> cTest)
{
myArray = tArray.clone();
tester = cTest;
Arrays.sort(myArray);
}
public void printIfValid()
{
for(int i = 0; i < myArray.length; i++)
{
if(tester.test(myArray[i]))
{
System.out.print(myArray[i] + " ");
}
}
System.out.println();
}
public int countIfValid()
{
int tracker = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < myArray.length; i++)
{
if(tester.test(myArray[i]))
{
tracker++;
}
}
return tracker;
}
}
CustomTest.java
public interface CustomTest<T> {
public boolean test(T t);
}
AllLower.java
public class AllLower implements CustomTest<String> {
public boolean test(String t) {
String lowerCaseVersion = t.toLowerCase();
return t.equals(lowerCaseVersion);
}
}
GreaterThan.java
public class GreaterThan<T extends Object> implements CustomTest<T> {
T memberT;
@Override
public boolean test(T t) {
int comparison = t.compareTo(memberT); //why doesnt this work?
if(comparison == 1)
{
return true;
}else{
return false;
}
}
public GreaterThan(T t)
{
memberT = t;
}
}
ECTester.java
public class ECTester {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Integer[] intArray = {2, 8, 6, 7, 4, 10, 3, 1, 9, 5};
Double[] dblArray = {11.9, 12.2, 5.4, 0.2, 3.3, 3.9, 4.2, 1.1, 123456.0, 10.0001};
String[] strArray = {"Why", "is", "A", "raven", "liKe", "a", "wriTing", "desk?"};
ArrayTester<Integer> intTest = new ArrayTester<Integer>(intArray, new IsEven<Integer>());
ArrayTester<Double> dblTest = new ArrayTester<Double>(dblArray, new IsEven<Double>());
ArrayTester<String> strTest = new ArrayTester<String>(strArray, new AllLower());
ArrayTester<Integer> intCompare = new ArrayTester<Integer>(intArray, new GreaterThan<Integer>(4));
ArrayTester<Double> dblCompare = new ArrayTester<Double>(dblArray, new GreaterThan<Double>(4.5));
ArrayTester<String> strCompare = new ArrayTester<String>(strArray, new GreaterThan<String>("last"));
System.out.println("There are " + intTest.countIfValid() + " valid integers");
System.out.println("They are: ");
intTest.printIfValid();
System.out.println();
System.out.println("There are " + dblTest.countIfValid() + " valid doubles");
System.out.println("They are: ");
dblTest.printIfValid();
System.out.println();
System.out.println("There are " + strTest.countIfValid() + " valid strings");
System.out.println("They are: ");
strTest.printIfValid();
System.out.println();
System.out.println("There are " + intCompare.countIfValid() + " integers greater than 4");
System.out.println("They are: ");
intCompare.printIfValid();
System.out.println();
System.out.println("There are " + dblCompare.countIfValid() + " doubles greater than 4.5");
System.out.println("They are: ");
dblCompare.printIfValid();
System.out.println();
System.out.println("There are " + strCompare.countIfValid() + " strings greater than \"last\"");
System.out.println("They are: ");
strCompare.printIfValid();
System.out.println();
}
}
IsEven.java
public class IsEven<T extends Number> implements CustomTest<T>{
@Override
public boolean test(T t) {
return (t%2==0);
}
//Can't figure out why it wont accept this
}
Unfortunately numeric operators like %
aren't available as polymorphic constructs: the type of the operands needs to be known at compile time, which means you can't use it with an arbitrary Number
.
And autoboxing/unboxing only applies when going from a specific primitive wrapper type (eg java.lang.Integer
) to the corresponding primitive type (ie int
); there is no primitive counterpart of Number
to unbox to.
What you can do is either use longValue()
or doubleValue()
to pull out a long
or double
that you can use %
with, or possibly use an if/else chain with instanceof
checks. This won't completely solve your problem because Number
is an open type -- non-primitive implementations exist. ( BigInteger
and BigDecimal
are the well-known ones, but third-party libraries can add their own Number
implementations as well.)
As for your other question about compareTo()
, as mentioned in the comments above, you need T extends Comparable<? super T>
T extends Comparable<? super T>
to ensure that the compareTo()
method exists.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.