I have created a simple QHBoxLayout
(horizontal) that is pushed to the bottom of the QVBoxLayout
(Vertical) and it contains two buttons. See code:
QWidget* create_ver_and_horizontal_box() {
QWidget* temp = new QWidget();
// Add buttons to the horizontal box
QHBoxLayout* hbox = new QHBoxLayout();
QPushButton *ok = new QPushButton("OK");
QPushButton *cancel = new QPushButton("Cancel");
hbox->addWidget(ok);
hbox->addWidget(cancel);
// Create a vertical box and add the horizontal box to
// the end of it
QVBoxLayout* vbox = new QVBoxLayout();
vbox->addStretch(1);
vbox->addLayout(hbox);
// set the layout and return
temp->setLayout(vbox);
return temp;
}
and the resulting UI is the following.
But when I add the QWidget temp
to be the parent of the QHBoxLayout, like so:
// Add buttons to the horizontal box
QHBoxLayout* hbox = new QHBoxLayout(temp);
I want to understand what is going on here. And in which cases I want the QWidget to be the parent of a layout or any other QWidget(s) and in which cases I don't the containing QWidget to be the parent of the containing QWidgets. For example, I could've added temp to be the parent of the two Push buttons but I didn't. What is the implication of not adding vs adding.
Thanks,
QHBoxLayout* hbox = new QHBoxLayout(temp);
is equivalent to
QHBoxLayout* hbox = new QHBoxLayout();
temp->setLayout(hbox);
Ie you are making the horizontal layout responsible for temp
.
The call to setLayout(vbox)
should have generated a runtime warning message, that temp
already has a layout, hinting at that.
Since you want the vertical layout to be responsible for that widget, either keep the temp->setLayout(vbox)
or pass temp
to the constructor of QVBoxLayout
.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.