I'm trying to initialize, in C++, a reference to a boost shared pointer passed from C#, while trying to maintain the inheritance tree. I want to be able to create a variable in C# then pass it to my DLL which will instantiate it internally (so that I can manage all memory allocation in the same context).
Here's my C++ test case (in file SwigTest.h) :
#include <string>
#include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp>
template<class T>
using SRef = boost::shared_ptr<T>;
class FactoryClass
{
public:
FactoryClass() {}
~FactoryClass() {}
//Normally I would only like to use the return value, but SWIG uses polymorphism to simulate templates
//and polymorphism on the return type only is not supported by C#. (I get a Identifier 'getReference' redefined error on SwigTest.i compilation).
//So I thought I’d pass the SRef& as a parameter instead of having no parameters at all.
template <class T>
static SRef<T> getReference( SRef<T>& inout ) { inout = SRef<T>( new T(1) ); return inout; }
void testing( int& toto ) {};
};
class BaseClass
{
public:
BaseClass() { m_flag = -1; };
BaseClass(int i) { m_flag = i; };
virtual ~BaseClass() {};
virtual std::string getName() = 0;
int m_flag;
};
class FirstClass : public BaseClass
{
public:
FirstClass() {};
FirstClass(int i) : BaseClass( i ) {};
virtual ~FirstClass() {};
virtual std::string getName() { return "First Class"; };
};
class SecondClass : public BaseClass
{
public:
SecondClass() {};
SecondClass(int i) : BaseClass( i ) {};
virtual ~SecondClass() {};
virtual std::string getName() { return "Second Class"; };
};
Here's my current SWIG interface file :
%module SwigTest
%include "std_string.i"
%include "boost_shared_ptr.i"
%{
#include "../include/SwigTest.h"
%}
%shared_ptr( BaseClass );
%shared_ptr( FirstClass );
%shared_ptr( SecondClass );
%include "../include/SwigTest.h"
%template(BoostBasePtr) boost::shared_ptr<BaseClass>;
%template(SharedBase) SRef<BaseClass>;
%template(BoostFirstPtr) boost::shared_ptr<FirstClass>;
%template(SharedFirst)SRef<FirstClass>;
%template(getReference)FactoryClass::getReference<FirstClass>;
%template(BoostSecondPtr) boost::shared_ptr<SecondClass>;
%template(SharedSecond)SRef<SecondClass>;
%template(getReference)FactoryClass::getReference<SecondClass>;
And here's what works and doesn't in C# :
public class SwigInterface
{
private FirstClass m_first;
private SecondClass m_second = new SecondClass(-2);
void TestSwig ()
{
m_first = FactoryClass.getReference( m_first ); //The returned reference is copied from C++
FactoryClass.getReference( m_second ); //m_second is never changed
FirstClass anotherFirst = new FirstClass(-1) ;
BaseClass bc = FactoryClass.getReference( anotherFirst); //bc does equal the new instance of FirstClass but anotherFirst is not correctly replaced
//This is the case I would ideally want to use
SecondClass nothing ;
FactoryClass.getReference( nothing ) ; //NullReferenceException (because the SWIG generated interface uses nothing.CPtr() to pass by pointer as it does with all refs).
}
}
I tried a lot of %typename
gymnastics to replace the signature of FactoryClass.getReference( FirstClass )
with FactoryClass.getReference( out FirstClass )
(or even ref FirstClass) but I can't find a way to do it properly.
In a perfect world, I would just like to generate a void getReference<T>( ref T inout )
in my FactoryClass in C#, but even adding the method using the SWIG %extend
keyword doesn't generate it because I have to instantiate every template I need.
If I understand your point, you have reached a SWIG limit. I have faced the same issue. Each pointer (smart or not) loses polymorphism once in C#.
You need to provide a special factory for your BaseClass in the C# side, using %pragma(csharp) directive. Then you need to map your pointer with a csout typemap like this:
%typemap(csout, excode=SWIGEXCODE)
BaseClass*, std::shared_ptr<BaseClass>, std::shared_ptr<BaseClass> & {
System.IntPtr cPtr = $imcall;
// The following line is a call to your special factory
BaseClass ret = $imclassname.createBaseClass(cPtr, $owner);$excode
return ret;
}
Your factory could be something like this:
%pragma(csharp) imclasscode=%{
public static BaseClass createBaseClass(System.IntPtr cPtr, bool owner)
{
BaseClass ret = null;
if (cPtr == System.IntPtr.Zero) {
return ret;
}
string name = ($imclassname.BaseClass_getName(new System.Runtime.InteropServices.HandleRef(null, cPtr)));
switch (name)
{
case "First Class":
return new FirstClass(cPtr, owner);
case "Second Class":
return new SecondClass(cPtr, owner);
default:
return null;
}
}
%}
I didn't test it, maybe there are some things to change or adapt. But it should work.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.