Let's say that we have the following interface
public interface Animal {
String getName();
ArrayList<Animal> getPack();
}
And the following implementation of it
public class Wolf implements Animal {
@Override
public String getName() {
return "wolf 1";
}
@Override
public ArrayList<Animal> getPack() {
return new ArrayList<>();
}
}
Is there any way to have the following instead?
@Override
public ArrayList<Wolf> getPack() {
return new ArrayList<>();
}
You can "kind of" do this with a generic interface:
public interface Animal<T extends Animal<T>> {
String getName();
ArrayList<T> getPack();
}
public class Wolf implements Animal<Wolf> {
@Override
public String getName() {
return null;
}
@Override
public ArrayList<Wolf> getPack() {
return null;
}
}
But the drawback of this is obviously that the responsibility of following rules is passed to the implementers. It is entirely possible to write a Cat
class that implements Animal<Wolf>
.
Try this:
public interface Animal {
String getName();
ArrayList<? extends Animal> getPack();
}
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.