I have created the below query to give me a result set within a date range say from 01-Jan-2018 (c_date_from ) and 31-dec-2018 (c_date_to)
Now I have to make a change in this. Say for example for the below data if I pass c_date_from as 01-Jan-2018 and c_date_to as 31-dec-2018. If the end date is 31-Dec-4712 it will treat it as null. It is working fine for all cases. But in the decode part of the code I now want to handle in such a way that if assignment_end_date column is > than the c_date_to it should treat it as null as well. For example :
+-----------+---------------+---------------+-----------------------+---------------------+--------+
| person_id | next_employee | employee_name | assignment_start_date | assignment_end_date | Client |
+-----------+---------------+---------------+-----------------------+---------------------+--------+
| 1 | XYZ | GEN | 02-JAN-2018 | 03-jun-18 | DEL |
| 1 | REC | GEN | 04-jun-18 | 01-nov-18 | DEL |
| 1 | YZ | GEN | 02-nov-18 | 01-JAN-2019 | DEL |
| 2 | FDGD | PA | 01-JAN-2018 | 02-APR-2018 | FAR |
| 2 | FDRY | PA | 03-APR-2018 | 31-DEC-4712 | FAR |
+-----------+---------------+---------------+-----------------------+---------------------+--------+
For the above table, my query fetches the data well and when the assignment_end_date is 31-dec-4712 then it changes it to NULL in the decode. Now i want if the assignment_end_date(person id 1 max date 01-jan-2019) is > c_date_to (31-dec-2018 in this case) then also it treats it as nul l. How can i handle it in the below query in the same de?ode.
SELECT papf.person_id,
LEAD(papf.employee_number) OVER( ORDER BY papf.employee_number, paaf.effective_start_date,change_date ) next_employee,
PAPF.full_name employee_name,
to_char(paaf.effective_start_date,'DD-MON-YY') assignment_start_date,
DECODE(paaf.effective_end_date, to_date('12/31/4712', 'MM/DD/YYYY'), NULL, paaf.effective_end_date) assignment_end_date,
ppd.segment3 Client,
from
xl.x_current_employees_gtt PAPF , -
per_all_assignments_f PAAF,
per_pay_proposals ppp,
per_position_definitions ppd
WHERE 1 = 1
--AND papf.employee_number in (60180)
AND ppp.change_date(+) <= c_date_to
AND ppp.date_to(+) >= c_date_from
AND ppp.change_date(+) <= paaf.effective_end_date
AND ppp.date_to(+) >= paaf.effective_start_date
AND ppp.assignment_id(+) = paaf.assignment_id
AND paaf.primary_flag = 'Y'
AND paaf.assignment_status_type_id = g_assignment_status_type_id
AND paaf.assignment_type = 'E'
AND paaf.effective_start_date <= paaf.effective_end_date -- There are some cases, due to which this condition has been included
AND paaf.effective_start_date <= c_date_to
AND paaf.effective_end_date >= c_date_from
AND PAAF.person_id IN ( PAPF.person_id , NVL(papf.sez_person_id,PAPF.person_id) )
ORDER BY employee_id,paaf.effective_start_date , change_date ;
It's not clear where c_date_to
is coming from, but I assume it's a column in one of these tables. So I would convert the DECODE
to a CASE
:
CASE WHEN paaf.effective_end_date = DATE '4712-12-31` OR
paaf.effective_end_date > c_date_too THEN NULL
ELSE paaf.effective_end_date END AS assignment_end_date
I find using a DATE
literal a bit shorter and more readable than TO_DATE
.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.