Fast copy and replicate (or fill) byte array with another byte array

Question

I'm currently sitting on a copy function that fills a destination byte array from a source byte array and replicates the source array as many times as needed until the destination array is filled (some call it MemCpyReplicate or similar). The target array is always a multiple of the length of the source array. My first attempt was a simple copy via the Unsafe.CopyBlockUnaligned intrinsic which simply emits a rep movsb :

public static void CopyRepeat(byte* destination, byte* source, int byteCount, int count) {
  while(count-- > 0) {
    Unsafe.CopyBlockUnaligned(destination, source, (uint)byteCount);
    destination += byteCount;
  }
}

Since the results were not satisfactory, I now wanted to use SIMD, more precisely the Vector<T> interface. But I don't know how to handle unaligned addresses and byte patterns smaller than the vector length. This would be my ideal solution: Source Array -> 10 Bytes, Vector -> 32 Bytes = 3 x byte pattern

The byte sequences are mostly in the range of 1 to 64 bytes. The number of repetitions ranges from 1 to 500. Is there a better solution or are there sample implementations for similar functions?

UPDATE: I have built two vectorized variants from the original version. The first one repeats the pattern in the vector so that the vector contains n patterns. If the pattern is too big for the vector, CopyBlock is used. The second variant repeats the pattern until there are more than the vector size of bytes in the destination and then always copies vector sized blocks (and moves the source window) without using CopyBlock.

Source code of the vectorized variants

However, I now get weird results in runtime for pattern sizes between 2 and 32 (the vector size in my case). I suspect it is related to reading from the moving source window, since doubling the window halved the execution time. For sizes larger than the vector size, I get the expected results:

Method	byteCount	count	Mean	Error	StdDev
Repeat_CopyBlock	3	16	19.38 ns	0.002 ns	0.002 ns
Repeat_NoCopyBlock	3	16	13.90 ns	0.106 ns	0.100 ns
Repeat_CopyBlock	3	128	25.00 ns	0.005 ns	0.005 ns
Repeat_NoCopyBlock	3	128	39.31 ns	0.135 ns	0.126 ns
Repeat_CopyBlock	12	16	10.64 ns	0.037 ns	0.031 ns
Repeat_NoCopyBlock	12	16	13.35 ns	0.024 ns	0.023 ns
Repeat_CopyBlock	12	128	25.56 ns	0.020 ns	0.019 ns
Repeat_NoCopyBlock	12	128	108.61 ns	0.164 ns	0.154 ns
Repeat_CopyBlock	16	16	68.74 ns	0.010 ns	0.009 ns
Repeat_NoCopyBlock	16	16	13.50 ns	0.002 ns	0.002 ns
Repeat_CopyBlock	16	128	81.41 ns	0.024 ns	0.022 ns
Repeat_NoCopyBlock	16	128	81.52 ns	0.067 ns	0.062 ns
Repeat_CopyBlock	48	16	48.84 ns	0.045 ns	0.042 ns
Repeat_NoCopyBlock	48	16	23.80 ns	0.089 ns	0.083 ns
Repeat_CopyBlock	48	128	364.76 ns	0.053 ns	0.045 ns
Repeat_NoCopyBlock	48	128	165.34 ns	0.145 ns	0.136 ns

public static unsafe void Repeat_NoCopyBlock(byte* destination, byte* source, int byteCount, int count) {
    if(byteCount == 1) {
        Unsafe.InitBlockUnaligned(destination, *source, (uint)count);
        return;
    }

    var absoluteByteCount = byteCount * count;
    var dst = destination;
    var offset = 0;

    do
    {
        if(offset == absoluteByteCount) return;

        offset += byteCount;

        var src = source;
        var remaining = byteCount;

        while((remaining & -4) != 0) {
            *((uint*)dst) = *((uint*)src);
            dst += 4;
            src += 4;
            remaining -= 4;
        }

        if((remaining & 2) != 0) {
            *((ushort*)dst) = *((ushort*)src);
            dst += 2;
            src += 2;
            remaining -= 2;
        }

        if((remaining & 1) != 0)
            *dst++ = *src;
    } while((offset & (2 * -Vector<byte>.Count)) == 0); // & -Vector<byte>.Count was 2x slower.

    var stopLoopAtOffset = absoluteByteCount - Vector<byte>.Count;
    var from = destination;
    // var buffer = offset;

    while(offset <= stopLoopAtOffset) {
        Unsafe.WriteUnaligned(dst, Unsafe.ReadUnaligned<Vector<byte>>(from));
        offset += Vector<byte>.Count;
        from   += Vector<byte>.Count;
        dst    += Vector<byte>.Count;
    }

    var rep = (offset / byteCount) * byteCount; // Closest pattern end.

    if(offset != absoluteByteCount) {
        // next line is the replacement for (buffer is the offset from destination before the loop above):
        // destination + buffer - Vector<byte>.Count
        var repEnd = destination + rep - Vector<byte>.Count;
        var dstEnd = destination + stopLoopAtOffset;
        Unsafe.WriteUnaligned(dstEnd, Unsafe.ReadUnaligned<Vector<byte>>(repEnd));
    }
}

public static unsafe void Repeat_CopyBlock(byte* destination, byte* source, int byteCount, int count) {
    if(count == 0) return;
    if(byteCount == 0) return;

    if(byteCount == 1) {
        Unsafe.InitBlockUnaligned(destination, *source, (uint)count);
        return;
    }

    var numElements = Vector<byte>.Count / byteCount;
    var numElementsByteCount = numElements * byteCount;

    var i = 0;
    var dst = destination;

    do
    {
        var remaining = byteCount;
        var src = source;

        while(remaining >= 4) {
            *((uint*)dst) = *((uint*)src);
            dst += 4;
            src += 4;
            remaining -= 4;
        }

        if((remaining & 2) != 0) {
            *((ushort*)dst) = *((ushort*)src);
            dst += 2;
            src += 2;
            remaining -= 2;
        }

        if((remaining & 1) != 0)
            *dst++ = *src;

        ++i; --count;
    } while(count != 0 && i < numElements);

    if(numElements > 0) { // Skip byteCounts larger than Vector<byte>.Count.
        var src = Unsafe.ReadUnaligned<Vector<byte>>(destination);

        while(count > numElements) {
            Unsafe.WriteUnaligned(dst, src);
            count -= numElements;
            dst += numElementsByteCount;
        }
    }

    while(count > 0) {
        Unsafe.CopyBlockUnaligned(dst, destination, (uint)byteCount);
        dst += byteCount;
        --count;
    }
}

Answer 1

In asm, it's fast to do overlapping stores, eg for a 10-byte pattern, you would do a 16-byte SIMD store and increment the pointer by 10.

But even more efficient to unroll the pattern across multiple registers and unroll the loop some. Ideally to lowest_common_multiple(pattern, vector_width) , but even just unrolling 3x to fill most of a 32-byte vector is good. (Or without AVX, across a pair of 16-byte vectors, so two stores that don't overlap each other for a total of 32 bytes). Especially when the repeat count isn't huge, so you can't spend forever setting up vectors.

Or to make the setup easier for longer patterns (without reading outside the boundaries of the src buffer): borrow glibc memcpy's strategy of doing for example a 30-byte copy with two overlapping 16-byte loads, one that starts at the start, one that ends at the end. So in the main loop you'd be doing a sequence of N stores with potential overlap, and then the next 30 bytes would be stored without overlapping the first.

Hmm, but a variable number of registers isn't easy to loop with, that would require different loops. Maybe always 4 vector registers but with variable offsets between them, so a single loop can use indexed addressing modes and a pointer increment. (That's not ideal for the stores running on AGUs on Intel before Ice Lake (the port7 AGU only handles 1-register addressing modes), but they're not competing with any loads from this logical core so it's probably fine.) Maybe some of the offsets can be fixed at the vector width, with only the last vector potentially partially overlapping the 3rd.

So it would be up to the setup code to figure out how many repeats of the pattern to fit into 3 to 4x the vector width, with what overlap within. Unfortunately palign is only available with an immediate count, and there'd be a store-forwarding stall if you use narrower stores to do the first few iterations of the pattern into the destination buffer your current way, and then reload from there into XMM or YMM registers. (And multiple SF stalls can't overlap their delay .)

---

IDK how easy it is to get C#'s JIT to emit asm like that, either with Vector<> intrinsics or Sse2.whatever / Avx.whater ; I haven't used C# for anything except SO answers; I'm just trying to point you in the direction of a good goal.