简体   繁体   中英

Role of combinators in concatenative/tacit programming languages

What exact role do higher-order combinators (or function producers) hold in concatenative and tacit programming ?

Is there another way to implement a concatenative programming language rather than directly manipulating the stack?

How tight is the relation between the combinators mentioned and Schonfinkel 's combinatory logic ?

Is there another way to implement a concatenative programming language rather than directly manipulating the stack?

Yes. The Enchilada language is based on term rewriting.

In my answer to "Explain Concatenative languages to me like I'm an 8 year old" I argued that it is not useful to use the word "concatenative" to describe programming languages . This area appears to be a private playground for Manfred von Thun. There is no real definition of what constitutes a concatenative language, and there is no mature theory underlying the idea of a concatenative language. Because the concept is not really defined, it is impossible to provide a definitive explanation of the role of combinators.

You might prefer to spend your time studying more well-established topics such as combinatory logic, SK combinators, lambda calculus, and graph-reduction machines. If you are interested in point-free programming from a more pragmatic perspective, APL, Forth, and PostScript are all well worth studying.

The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM