I have always wondered, why does Java require you set the heap size manually? I was under the impression that programs written in other languages would just allocate as much memory as needed as the program run until the OS could allocate no more.
In the Java world we need to set the heap, stack, and permgen size. While this is simple enough forgetting to increase these to "large enough" numbers is the #1 reason I have seen servers go down.
Why is it not possible to tell Java to grow the heap/stack/permgen as much as it needs over time?
Three reasons:
My interpretation is that Sun is a company focused on selling Big Boxes and they like that the sysadmins can do things on these boxes. Running a system to fill all the memory is a good way to run it into the ground and be unable to efficiently take action to restore operation because you cannot allocate memory to create a login shell for example.
I think because actual memory of computer is finite. So, in a sense, JVM allows you to detect memleaks before all memory is wasted.
Plus, what to do if you run several JVMs on the same machine -- in this case how do you allow each of these JVM to grow "as much as it needs"?
Because growing the heap, stack, and permgen size dynamically just would make the server go down anyway. In such a world, the server would eventually leak away all of its resources.
Also, developing automatic memory management wasn't as mature as it is today. Having virtual limits makes things easier if you pick the wrong defaults, but it can make the coding a bit less efficient on the back end.
Yes, these are guesses, but reasonable ones; especially when you consider Java's / Oak's origins of embedded set top box programming. It isn't like an embedded system is going to have swap or disk backed virtual memory, so why make the JVM act as if it were available?
Old topic but I got here and I think I know the answer.
Complementing what Peter said, the Java ecosystem is entirely designed for system administrators and support teams. In the same way that the administrator defines the memory resources that he wants to be used by the application, the same happens with database connections (JNDI) in which you do not need to give the application or your developer where the database production is, just the name that references the resource. Everything Sun did had a perfect mission-critical management system. In the case of the Solaris operating system, Sun has developed a feature called "projects" ( https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E37838_01/html/E61042/index.html ) that serves for the administrator to limit server resources in applications of any programming language (as you mentioned above). Therefore, it is important for a production system to let the system administrator know how much resources the application is able to use and to be able to limit what is necessary. And this is not unique to Java or Sun products. In the case of .NET it is possible to limit these resources ( https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/iis/configuration/system.applicationhost/applicationpools/add/processmodel ), Ruby ( https://gist.github . com/jjb/7389552), Node.JS ( How do I determine the correct "max-old-space-size" for node.js? ) and etc.
Learning to manage is important like learning to develop. A lot of people think Docker is a modern marvel while FreeBSD Jails, Solaris Zones and so on existed a long time ago. What makes good software not fail is that it is well written and well managed.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.