I am trying to copy data from table "tb_A" to itself (with different primary key).
When "tb_A" table is insert new record, I have written a trigger to populate another table "tb_B" with one record.
I ran the following statement.
INSERT INTO [tb_A]
([NAME])
select top (20)[NAME] from [tb_A]
I was expected 20 new records in "tb_B". But I didn't.
Anyway I saw FIRE_TRIGGERS is using during bulk insert to overcome this issue. is there is a any way to use it on inset statements too ? Please provide me example.
Gayan
Trigger code (copied from Gayan's comment to gbn's answer):
CREATE TRIGGER UpdatetbB ON [dbo].[tb_A] FOR INSERT
AS
DECLARE @AID as int
SELECT @AID = [ID] FROM inserted
INSERT INTO [tb_B]([IDA]) VALUES (@AID)
The reason your trigger did not work properly is because it is poorly designed. Triggers fire once for each insert even if you are inserting a million records. You havea trigger that makes the assumption it will owrk one record at a time. Anytime you set a value form inserted or deleted to a scalar variable the trigger is wrong and needs to be rewritten. Try something like this instead.
CREATE TRIGGER UpdatetbB ON [dbo].[tb_A] FOR INSERT
AS
INSERT INTO [tb_B]([IDA])
SELECT [ID] FROM inserted
FIRE_TRIGGERS is only for BULK INSERT (and bcp), not "standard" INSERT
I'd expect your trigger to look something like
CREATE TRIGGER TRG_tbA_I ON tb_A FOR INSERT
AS
SET NOCOUNT ON
INSERT tb_B (col1, col2, ...)
SELECT col1, col2, ... FROM INSERTED
GO
You use the special INSERTED table to get the list of new rows in tb_A, then INSERT from this into tb_B. This works for more than one row
If you add the trigger code then we can explain what went wrong.
Edit: your trigger will only read a single row (any row, no particular order) from INSERTED. It isn't set based like my rough example.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.