The following code is intended to update particular fields only when there's a value that relates to that field.
It returns an incomplete set of values. Millions of rows are correct, but several thousand rows have values incorrectly set to NULL.
Is this is SQL limitation, or am I missing something?
UPDATE a
SET ResultType1 = CASE WHEN b.[Type] = 'type1' THEN b.value END
,ResultType2 = CASE WHEN b.[Type] = 'type2' THEN b.value END
FROM tableA AS a
INNER JOIN tableB AS b ON a.ID = b.ID
update particular fields only when there's a value that relates to that field
makes me think that you actually want to do this:
UPDATE a
SET ResultType1 = CASE WHEN b.[Type] = 'type1'
THEN b.value
ELSE ResultType1
END
, ResultType2 = CASE WHEN b.[Type] = 'type2'
THEN b.value
ELSE ResultType2
END
FROM tableA AS a
INNER JOIN tableB AS b ON a.ID = b.ID
So, ResultType1/2 will be set to their existing values if the b.Type conditions are not met, INSTEAD of being set to NULL.
I am assuming that when you say "incomplete set of values", you mean that some are being set to NULL.
What is causing this behaviour is the implied ELSE NULL
in CASE
expressions.
If you actually want to update ResultType1
and ResultType2
with nulls, but only for those rows that are of different 'type'
, a slightly different query will do:
UPDATE a
SET ResultType1 = CASE WHEN b.[Type] = 'type1'
THEN b.value
ELSE NULL --- this line can be removed
END
, ResultType2 = CASE WHEN b.[Type] = 'type2'
THEN b.value
ELSE NULL --- this one, too
END
FROM tableA AS a
INNER JOIN tableB AS b ON a.ID = b.ID
WHERE b.[Type] IN ('type1', 'type2')
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.