I have a class called Contact, which is the superclass of classes named PersonalContact and BusinessContact.
I have one abstract method in my class which is supposed to tell the subclasses to implement it. The method is
public abstract Set<T> getEventsWithinPeriod(DateTime start, DateTime end);
The T is there to be interchanged with the different type of events in each subclass. PersonalContacts have birthdays, and BusinessContacts have meetings. The problem is I am getting an error saying T cannot be resolved to a type
, but isn't that the whole point of generics?
I tried putting the in the class header as well
public abstract class Contact<T> implements Comparable<Contact>{
but the compiler gives me a warning saying
Contact is a raw type. References to generic type Contact<T> should be parameterized.
How do I fix this?
It should introduce a formal type parameter:
public abstract <T> Set<T> getEventsWithinPeriod(Class<T> type, DateTime start, DateTime end);
It will actually work even without the parameter Class<T> type
. But looks like you plan to instantiate that T
inside the method (which you can't do because of type-erasure). So that paramter is there to help instantiate the actual-type reflectively at runtime.
Since you want to tie T with the subclass instead of getEventsWithinPeriod method, declare T as parameter for contact.
public abstract class Contact<T>
{
public abstract Set<T> getEventsWithinPeriod();
}
class DOB
{
}
class BMeeting
{
}
class PersonalContact extends Contact<DOB>
{
@Override
public Set<DOB> getEventsWithinPeriod()
{
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return null;
}
}
class BusinessContact extends Contact<BMeeting>
{
@Override
public Set<BMeeting> getEventsWithinPeriod()
{
return null;
}
}
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.