Inheritance best practice : *args, **kwargs or explicitly specifying parameters [closed]

Question

. 。 This question is opinion-based . It is not currently accepting answers.

---

Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post .

Closed 16 hours ago .

The community is reviewing whether to reopen this question as of 16 hours ago .

Improve this question

I often find myself overwriting methods of a parent class, and can never decide if I should explicitly list given parameters or just use a blanket *args, **kwargs construct. Is one version better than the other? Is there a best practice? What (dis-)advantages am I missing?

class Parent(object):

    def save(self, commit=True):
        # ...

class Explicit(Parent):

    def save(self, commit=True):
        super(Explicit, self).save(commit=commit)
        # more logic

class Blanket(Parent):

    def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
        super(Blanket, self).save(*args, **kwargs)
        # more logic

Perceived benefits of explicit variant

• More explicit (Zen of Python)
• easier to grasp
• function parameters easily accessed

Perceived benefits of blanket variant

• more DRY
• parent class is easily interchangeable
• change of default values in parent method is propagated without touching other code

Answer 1

Liskov Substitution Principle

Generally you don't want you method signature to vary in derived types. This can cause problems if you want to swap the use of derived types. This is often referred to as the Liskov Substitution Principle .

Benefits of Explicit Signatures

At the same time I don't think it's correct for all your methods to have a signature of *args , **kwargs . Explicit signatures:

• help to document the method through good argument names
• help to document the method by specifying which args are required and which have default values
• provide implicit validation (missing required args throw obvious exceptions)

Variable Length Arguments and Coupling

Do not mistake variable length arguments for good coupling practice. There should be a certain amount of cohesion between a parent class and derived classes otherwise they wouldn't be related to each other. It is normal for related code to result in coupling that reflects the level of cohesion.

Places To Use Variable Length Arguments

Use of variable length arguments shouldn't be your first option. It should be used when you have a good reason like:

• Defining a function wrapper (ie a decorator).
• Defining a parametric polymorphic function.
• When the arguments you can take really are completely variable (eg a generalized DB connection function). DB connection functions usually take a connection string in many different forms, both in single arg form, and in multi-arg form. There are also different sets of options for different databases.
• ...

Are You Doing Something Wrong?

If you find you are often creating methods which take many arguments or derived methods with different signatures you may have a bigger issue in how you're organizing your code.

Answer 2

My choice would be:

class Child(Parent):

    def save(self, commit=True, **kwargs):
        super(Child, self).save(commit, **kwargs)
        # more logic

It avoids accessing commit argument from *args and **kwargs and it keeps things safe if the signature of Parent:save changes (for example adding a new default argument).

Update : In this case, having the *args can cause troubles if a new positional argument is added to the parent. I would keep only **kwargs and manage only new arguments with default values. It would avoid errors to propagate.

Answer 3

If you are certain that Child will keep the signature, surely the explicit approach is preferable, but when Child will change the signature I personally prefer to use both approaches:

class Parent(object):
    def do_stuff(self, a, b):
        # some logic

class Child(Parent):
    def do_stuff(self, c, *args, **kwargs):
        super(Child, self).do_stuff(*args, **kwargs)
        # some logic with c

This way, changes in the signature are quite readable in Child, while the original signature is quite readable in Parent.

In my opinion this is also the better way when you have multiple inheritance, because calling super a few times is quite disgusting when you don't have args and kwargs.

For what it's worth, this is also the preferred way in quite a few Python libs and frameworks (Django, Tornado, Requests, Markdown, to name a few). Although one should not base his choices on such things, I'm merely implying that this approach is quite widespread.

Answer 4

Not really an answer but more a side note: If you really, really want to make sure the default values for the parent class are propagated to the child classes you can do something like:

class Parent(object):

    default_save_commit=True
    def save(self, commit=default_save_commit):
        # ...

class Derived(Parent):

    def save(self, commit=Parent.default_save_commit):
        super(Derived, self).save(commit=commit)

However I have to admit this looks quite ugly and I would only use it if I feel I really need it.

Answer 5

我更喜欢显式参数，因为自动完成允许您在进行函数调用时查看函数的方法签名。

Answer 6

In addition to the other answers:

Having variable arguments may "decouple" the parent from the child, but creates a coupling between the object created and the parent, which I think is worse, because now you created a "long distance" couple (more difficult to spot, more difficult to maintain, because you may create several objects in your application)

If you're looking for decoupling, take a look at composition over inheritance

Answer 7

Why is nobody pointing out the fact that the Parent class save() method is not implementing the *args and **kwargs which would cause an error if instances of Blanket tries to call the save method with more keyword or positional arguments.