[英]How to curve_fit an implicit scalar function using SciPy?
是否可以将scipy.optimize.curve_fit
与scipy.optimize.bisect
(或fsolve
或其他)连接起来用于隐式标量函数?
在实践中,看看这个 Python 代码,我尝试定义一个隐式 function 并将其传递给curve_fit
以获得参数的最佳拟合:
import numpy as np
import scipy.optimize as opt
import scipy.special as spc
# Estimate of initial parameter (not really important for this example)
fact, _, _, _ = spc.airy(-1.0188)
par0 = -np.log(2.0*fact*(18**(1.0/3.0))*np.pi*1e-6)
# Definition of an implicit parametric function f(c,t;b)=0
def func_impl(c, t, p) :
return ( c - ((t**3)/9.0) / ( np.log(t*(c**(1.0/3.0))) + p ) )
# definition of the function I believe should be passed to curve_fit
def func_egg(t, p) :
x_st, _ = opt.bisect( lambda x : func_impl(x, t, p), a=0.01, b=0.3 )
return x_st
# Some data points
t_data = np.deg2rad(np.array([95.0, 69.1, 38.8, 14.7]))
c_data = np.array([0.25, 0.10, 0.05, 0.01])
# Call to curve_fit
popt, pcov = opt.curve_fit(func_egg, t_data, c_data, p0=par0)
b = popt[0]
现在,我知道在尝试自动查找根时可能 go 错误的所有事情(尽管二等分应该是稳定的,前提是a和b之间有根); 但是,我得到的错误似乎与 func_impl 的func_impl
的维度有关:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "example_fit.py", line 23, in <module>
popt, pcov = opt.curve_fit(func_egg, t_data, c_data, p0=par0)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/scipy/optimize/minpack.py", line 752, in curve_fit
res = leastsq(func, p0, Dfun=jac, full_output=1, **kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/scipy/optimize/minpack.py", line 383, in leastsq
shape, dtype = _check_func('leastsq', 'func', func, x0, args, n)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/scipy/optimize/minpack.py", line 26, in _check_func
res = atleast_1d(thefunc(*((x0[:numinputs],) + args)))
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/scipy/optimize/minpack.py", line 458, in func_wrapped
return func(xdata, *params) - ydata
File "example_fit.py", line 15, in func_egg
x_st, _ = opt.bisect( lambda x : func_impl(x, t, p), a=0.01, b=0.3 )
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/scipy/optimize/zeros.py", line 550, in bisect
r = _zeros._bisect(f, a, b, xtol, rtol, maxiter, args, full_output, disp)
File "example_fit.py", line 15, in <lambda>
x_st, _ = opt.bisect( lambda x : func_impl(x, t, p), a=0.01, b=0.3 )
File "example_fit.py", line 11, in func_impl
return ( c - ((t**3)/9.0) / ( np.log(t*(c**(1.0/3.0))) + p ) )
TypeError: only size-1 arrays can be converted to Python scalars
我的猜测是, curve_fit
基本上将输入 function 的 output 视为与输入数据具有相同维度的向量; 我想我可以通过“矢量化”隐式 function 或func_egg
来轻松解决这个问题,尽管它看起来不像我想象的那么简单。
我错过了什么吗?
有简单的解决方法吗?
我想我最终会回答我自己的问题。 我希望这对其他人有用。
我们先选择一个更简单的隐式function,在这种情况下,f(c,t;b)=cb*t^3(后面会讲清楚原因):
import numpy as np
import scipy.optimize as opt
import scipy.special as spc
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Definition of an implicit parametric function f(c,t;b)=0
def func_impl(c, t, p) :
return (c-p*t**3)
让我们矢量化它:
v_func_impl = np.vectorize(func_impl)
与问题中的脚本相同,但现在(1) func_egg
已矢量化,并且(2)我使用newton
而不是bisect
(我发现提供x0
而不是[a,b]
更容易):
# Definition of the function I believe should be passed to curve_fit
def func_egg(t, p) :
x_st = opt.newton( lambda x : func_impl(x, t, p), x0=0.05 )
return x_st
v_func_egg = np.vectorize(func_egg)
# Some data points
t_data = np.deg2rad(np.array([127.0, 95.0, 69.1, 38.8]))
c_data = np.array([0.6, 0.25, 0.10, 0.05])
# Call to curve_fit
par0 = 0.05
popt, pcov = opt.curve_fit(v_func_egg, t_data, c_data, p0=par0)
b = popt[0]
现在它起作用了!
plt.plot(t_data, c_data)
plt.plot(np.linspace(0.5, 2.5), b*np.linspace(0.5, 2.5)**3)
plt.show()
所以,本质上:
scipy
curve-fitting and root-finding one needs to ensure that each function is vectorized (or can deal with numpy
arrays as input and output).
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.