I'm looking at the Instagram blog post about sharded ID generation . This blog post describes generating 64-bit identifiers. Their mechanism allocates 41 of the 64 bits to a millisecond timestamp, and they say:
- 41 bits for time in milliseconds (gives us 41 years of IDs with a custom epoch)
Is this a typo? I calculated that you can store 69 years of millisecond timestamps in 41 bits. Here's how:
So, where am I wrong?
You're not wrong about the calculation.
(2^41)-1 ms
== 2199023255.551 s
== 610839.7932086 hr
== 25451.65805036 days
== 69.6828 Julian years
== 69.6843 Gregorian Years
Which lines up closely with your result ( 69 years
).
However, the website you link to does say that 41 bits
gives them
41 years of IDs with a custom epoch
"Epoch" in this context is probably referring to the start date. Given that that article was published "3 years ago", or in 2012
, we can calculate that their epoch begins in 2012 + 41 - 69 == 1984
. This date was possibly chosen as a reference .
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.