What is the C# equivalent of the stl set?

Question

I want to store some values in a balanced binary search tree using C#. I looked through the collections in the generics namespace and I haven't found an equivalent of the stl set.

What generic collection can I use? (I don't want to store key/value pairs... just values.)

Answer 1

You could use an HashSet

The HashSet<T> class provides high performance set operations. A set is a collection that contains no duplicate elements , and whose elements are in no particular order.

The capacity of a HashSet<T> object is the number of elements that the object can hold. A HashSet<T> object's capacity automatically increases as elements are added to the object.

Answer 2

1. If you require sorted set, use SortedDictionary<T,U> . This is implemented using a binary search tree. Admittedly, you will be using 64-bits per entry because you are storing a key-value pair underneath. You can write a wrapper around it like this:

    class Set<T> : SortedDictionary<T, bool> { public void Add(T item) { this.Add(item, true); } }

2. If you don't require a sorted set, use HashSet<T> .

3. Otherwise, check out C5 Generic Collection Library . In particular TreeSet<T> . It is a red-black tree and only stores the values.

Answer 3

Try RedBlackTree.NET . It's in VB but I think it can be easily converted to C#.

And I believe some of the collection type actually uses a red-black tree internally . So you might want to decompile the framework itself and look around for some clues.

I don't think a binary tree can be replaced by a HashSet. Their performance characteristics are different, roughly:

HashSet - O(1) lookup (n) search
Binary search tree - O(log n) lookup O(log n) search

If you want to store the values and later perform a search, you will want to be using a binary tree instead of a HashSet.

Answer 4

HashSet, but HashSet isn't available in version 2.0 of the framework. If you need something for 2.0 then use Dictionary, and specify a dummy type (eg object, int, or bool) for which you supply a dummy value (eg null, 0, or false) as the second/value parameter (ie use the Dictionary as a set of keys without caring about the associated values).

Answer 5

我知道这个问题很老，但对于 .NET Framework 4.0 及更高版本，请使用SortedSet<T>或ImmutableSortedSet<T> 。