Python just gave me weird advice:
>>> import random
>>> random.sample({1: 2, 3: 4, 5: 6}, 2)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#11>", line 1, in <module>
random.sample({1: 2, 3: 4, 5: 6}, 2)
File "C:\Users\*****\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python310\lib\random.py", line 466, in sample
raise TypeError("Population must be a sequence. For dicts or sets, use sorted(d).")
TypeError: Population must be a sequence. For dicts or sets, use sorted(d).
Note the second part of the last error line. Why should I sort if I'm going to randomize a moment later anyway? Seems like wasting O(n log n) time.
From the commit history of cpython - My emphasis: github
In the future, the population must be a sequence. Instances of
:class:set
are no longer supported. The set must first be converted to a:class:list
or:class:tuple
, preferably in a deterministic order so that the sample is reproducible.
If you don't care about reproducibility sorting is not necessary.
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.