简体繁体中英

SCJD synchronized statement vs Lock

原文 2011-08-09 18:31:55 7 1 java

I'm trying to justify the use of synchronized statement vs Java Concurrent API for my SCJD.

So far the only reason I can give is it is more simple, easier to understand and cleaner.

Are there any better technical reasons?

1 answers

The best reason is robustness.

A lock must be released, and forgetting to do it, or not doing it properly (in a finally block) can have disastrous effects.

Since synchronized protects a whole block of code or a method, and automatically releases the lock when the block or method ends, using it is safer and leads to less programming errors.

synchronized vs lock vs synchronized map

Static lock object of a synchronized statement in Java

Lock as a member of entity vs synchronized (best practice)

Lock or synchronized

What should I use as a lock object of a synchronized statement in Java

Thread not synchronized with single lock

Is this synchronized lock order work?

Releasing a “synchronized” lock

Does Synchronized retain lock

synchronized lock on object

暂无

The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.

Related Question synchronized vs lock vs synchronized map Static lock object of a synchronized statement in Java Lock as a member of entity vs synchronized (best practice) Lock or synchronized What should I use as a lock object of a synchronized statement in Java Thread not synchronized with single lock Is this synchronized lock order work? Releasing a “synchronized” lock Does Synchronized retain lock synchronized lock on object

Related Tags

SCJD synchronized statement vs Lock

Question

1 answers

solution1 2 2012-02-26 22:52:58

solution1
2 2012-02-26 22:52:58