Apologies if I am asking something stupid (I'm pretty new to coding), but I didn't manage to find a clear explanation to my doubt. I came across the following problem on leetcode:
You are given an nxn 2D matrix representing an image, rotate the image by 90 degrees (clockwise). You have to rotate the image in-place, which means you have to modify the input 2D matrix directly. DO NOT allocate another 2D matrix and do the rotation. Example: Input: matrix = [[1,2,3],[4,5,6],[7,8,9]] Output: [[7,4,1],[8,5,2],[9,6,3]]
My solution is:
class Solution:
def rotate(self, matrix):
l = len(matrix)
clockwise_nums = [matrix[j][i] for i in range(l) for j in range(l - 1, -1, -1)]
final_array = [clockwise_nums[i:i + l] for i in range(0, len(clockwise_nums), l)]
return final_array
The sheer execution (matrix rotation) works but this is not accepted as it's not in-place. But I don't really get what that means. Do you think my approach is way off here and I should try something different? Or is there a way to adjust my solution (was quite happy that I came up with a way to rotate the matrix)? Also, any tip about in-place algorithm would be much appreciated. Many thanks!
To understand the difference between "do the operation in-place" and "return a new array", imagine a simpler problem:
You are given a list. Add 1 to every element of the list.
# returning a new array
def add_one_copy(l):
return [x + 1 for x in l]
# in-place
def add_one_inplace(l):
for i in range(len(l)):
l[i] = l[i] + 1
Testing those two functions in the python interactive interpreter highlights the difference:
>>> a = [1, 2, 3]
>>> add_one_copy(a)
[2, 3, 4]
>>> a
[1, 2, 3]
>>> add_one_inplace(a)
>>> a
[2, 3, 4]
add_one_copy
returns a result, but does not modify a
. add_one_inplace
does not return a result, but modifies the list. There is the same difference between the python functions sorted
and list.sort
:
>>> a = [3,4,2,1]
>>> sorted(a)
[1, 2, 3, 4]
>>> a
[3, 4, 2, 1]
>>> a.sort()
>>> a
[1, 2, 3, 4]
sorted
returns a result, but does not modify the list. .sort
modifies the list and does not return a result.
Now, the problem you are trying to solve is a little bit more complicated than just adding 1 to every element. The difficulty when solving your rotation problem in-place is that you are moving elements around in the matrix; when doing that, you must be careful not to overwrite the values of elements which you still need. Imagine a slightly harder problem:
You are given a list. Reverse the order of the elements in the list.
# returning a copy
def reverse_copy(l):
return [l[len(l) - i - 1] for i in range(len(l))]
# in-place attempt, fall head-first in the trap, this is not working
def reverse_inplace_wrong(l):
for i in range(len(l)):
l[i] = l[len(l) - i - 1]
# in-place, correct
def reverse_inplace(l):
for i in range(len(l)//2):
tmp = l[len(l) - i - 1]
l[len(l) - i - 1] = l[i]
l[i] = tmp
Testing:
>>> a = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
>>> reverse_copy(a)
[7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1]
>>> a
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
>>> reverse_inplace_wrong(a)
>>> a
[7, 6, 5, 4, 5, 6, 7]
>>> a = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
>>> reverse_inplace(a)
>>> a
[7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1]
When reversing the list, I figured out that element at position i
should go to position len(l) - i - 1
. When rotating the matrix, you have to figure out where the element at position (i,j)
should go. And you have to be careful not to repeat the mistake I made in reverse_inplace_wrong
.
For solving this problem we can also use Python built-in reverse()
, wouldn't be a deal breaker:
class Solution:
def rotate(self, A):
A.reverse()
for row in range(len(A)):
for col in range(row):
A[row][col], A[col][row] = A[col][row], A[row][col]
If you know C++ you may have a look at my solution.
I solved it using the logic of transpose of a matrix. And after transposing, I swapped the first column value with the last column, in the same row. Then the second column with the second last column, and so on.
void swapValues(int &valueOne, int &valueTwo) {
int tempValue = valueOne;
valueOne = valueTwo;
valueTwo = tempValue;
}
void rotate(vector<vector<int> >& matrix) {
int n = matrix.size();
int halfN = n / 2;
for (int i=0; i<n; i++) {
for (int j=0; j<n; j++) {
if(i != j && j > i) {
swapValues(matrix[i][j], matrix[j][i]);
}
}
for (int j=0; j<halfN; j++) {
swapValues(matrix[i][j], matrix[i][n-1-j]);
}
}
}
class Solution:
def rotate(self, matrix):
rotate_mat = []
for l in range(len(matrix)):
mat = [i[l] for i in matrix][::-1]
rotate_mat.append(mat)
return rotate_mat
The technical post webpages of this site follow the CC BY-SA 4.0 protocol. If you need to reprint, please indicate the site URL or the original address.Any question please contact:yoyou2525@163.com.