[英]Calculating Fscore for each epoch using keras (not batch-wise)
这个问题的实质:
我想找到一种正确的方法来计算每个时期之后的验证和训练数据的 Fscore(不是批量)
对于二进制分类任务,我想使用简单的keras
model 计算每个时期后的Fscore
。 但如何计算Fscore
似乎颇受讨论。
我知道keras
分批工作,计算每批fscore 的一种方法是https://stackoverflow.com/a/45305384/10053244 (Fscore-calculation: f1
)。
批量计算可能会非常混乱,我更喜欢在每个 epoch 之后计算 Fscore 。 因此,仅调用history.history['f1']
或history.history['val_f1']
并不能解决问题,因为它会显示批量 fscores。
我想出一种方法是使用from keras.callbacks import ModelCheckpoint
function 保存每个 model:
model.evaluate
或model.predict
编辑:
使用 tensorflow 后端,我决定跟踪TruePositives
、 FalsePositives
和FalseNegatives
(正如 umbreon29 建议的那样)。 但是现在有趣的部分来了:重新加载 model 时的结果对于训练数据是不同的(TP、FP、FN 不同) ,但对于验证集却没有!
因此,一个简单的 model 存储权重以重建每个 model 并重新计算 TP、FN、TP(最后是 Fscore)如下所示:
from keras.metrics import TruePositives, TrueNegatives, FalseNegatives, FalsePositives
## simple keras model
sequence_input = Input(shape=(input_dim,), dtype='float32')
preds = Dense(1, activation='sigmoid',name='output')(sequence_input)
model = Model(sequence_input, preds)
model.compile(loss='binary_crossentropy',
optimizer='adam',
metrics=[TruePositives(name='true_positives'),
TrueNegatives(name='true_negatives'),
FalseNegatives(name='false_negatives'),
FalsePositives(name='false_positives'),
f1])
# model checkpoints
filepath="weights-improvement-{epoch:02d}-{val_f1:.2f}.hdf5"
checkpoint = ModelCheckpoint(os.path.join(savemodel,filepath), monitor='val_f1', verbose=1, save_best_only=False, save_weights_only=True, mode='auto')
callbacks_list = [checkpoint]
history = model.fit(x_train, y_train, validation_data=(x_val, y_val), epochs=epoch, batch_size=batch,
callbacks=[callbacks_list])
## Saving TP, FN, FP to calculate Fscore
tp.append(history.history['true_positives'])
fp.append(history.history['false_positives'])
fn.append(history.history['false_negatives'])
arr_train = np.stack((tp, fp, fn), axis=1)
## doing the same for tp_val, fp_val, fn_val
[...]
arr_val = np.stack((tp_val, fp_val, fn_val), axis=1)
## following method just showes batch-wise fscores and shouldnt be used:
## f1_sc.append(history.history['f1'])
在每个 epoch 之后重新加载 model 以计算 Fscores(使用 sklearn fscore metric from sklearn.metrics import f1_score
的predict
方法等效于从 TP,FP,FN 计算 fscore metric):
Fscore_val = []
fscorepredict_val_sklearn = []
Fscore_train = []
fscorepredict_train = []
## model_loads contains list of model-paths
for i in model_loads:
## rebuilding the model each time since only weights are stored
sequence_input = Input(shape=(input_dim,), dtype='float32')
preds = Dense(1, activation='sigmoid',name='output')(sequence_input)
model = Model(sequence_input, preds)
model.load_weights(i)
# Compile model (required to make predictions)
model.compile(loss='binary_crossentropy',
optimizer='adam',
metrics=[TruePositives(name='true_positives'),
TrueNegatives(name='true_negatives'),
FalseNegatives(name='false_negatives'),
FalsePositives(name='false_positives'),
f1
])
### For Validation data
## using evaluate
y_pred = model.evaluate(x_val, y_val, verbose=0)
Fscore_val.append(y_pred) ## contains (loss,tp,fp,fn, f1-batchwise)
## using predict
y_pred = model.predict(x_val)
val_preds = [1 if x > 0.5 else 0 for x in y_pred]
cm = f1_score(y_val, val_preds)
fscorepredict_val_sklearn.append(cm) ## equivalent to Fscore calculated from Fscore_vals tp,fp, fn
### For the training data
y_pred = model.evaluate(x_train, y_train, verbose=0)
Fscore_train.append(y_pred) ## also contains (loss,tp,fp,fn, f1-batchwise)
y_pred = model.predict(x_train, verbose=0) # gives probabilities
train_preds = [1 if x > 0.5 else 0 for x in y_pred]
cm = f1_score(y_train, train_preds)
fscorepredict_train.append(cm)
使用Fscore_val
的 tp,fn,fp 从 tp,fn 和 fp 计算 Fscore 并将其与fscorepredict_val_sklearn
进行比较与从arr_val
计算它是等效的和相同的。
但是,比较Fscore_train
和arr_train
时,tp、fn 和 fp 的数量是不同的。 因此,我也得出了不同的 Fscores。 tp,fn,fp 的数量应该是相同的,但它们不是。这是一个错误吗?
我应该相信哪一个? fscorepredict_train
似乎实际上更值得信赖,因为它们从“总是猜测 class 1”-Fscore 开始(当召回 = 1 时)。 ( fscorepredict_train[0]=0.6784
vs f_hist[0]=0.5736
vs always-guessing-class-1-fscore = 0.6751)
[注: Fscore_train[0] = [0.6853608025386962, 2220.0, 250.0, 111.0, 1993.0, 0.6730511784553528]
(loss,tp,tn,fp,fn) 导致 fscore= 0.6784, 所以 Fscore_train 中的 Fscore = fscoredict_train]
我提供了一个自定义回调,用于计算时期结束时所有数据的分数(在你的情况下是来自 sklearn 的 F1)(用于训练和可选的验证)
class F1History(tf.keras.callbacks.Callback):
def __init__(self, train, validation=None):
super(F1History, self).__init__()
self.validation = validation
self.train = train
def on_epoch_end(self, epoch, logs={}):
logs['F1_score_train'] = float('-inf')
X_train, y_train = self.train[0], self.train[1]
y_pred = (self.model.predict(X_train).ravel()>0.5)+0
score = f1_score(y_train, y_pred)
if (self.validation):
logs['F1_score_val'] = float('-inf')
X_valid, y_valid = self.validation[0], self.validation[1]
y_val_pred = (self.model.predict(X_valid).ravel()>0.5)+0
val_score = f1_score(y_valid, y_val_pred)
logs['F1_score_train'] = np.round(score, 5)
logs['F1_score_val'] = np.round(val_score, 5)
else:
logs['F1_score_train'] = np.round(score, 5)
这是一个虚拟示例:
x_train = np.random.uniform(0,1, (30,10))
y_train = np.random.randint(0,2, (30))
x_val = np.random.uniform(0,1, (20,10))
y_val = np.random.randint(0,2, (20))
sequence_input = Input(shape=(10,), dtype='float32')
preds = Dense(1, activation='sigmoid',name='output')(sequence_input)
model = Model(sequence_input, preds)
es = EarlyStopping(patience=3, verbose=1, min_delta=0.001, monitor='F1_score_val', mode='max', restore_best_weights=True)
model.compile(loss='binary_crossentropy', optimizer='adam')
model.fit(x_train,y_train, epochs=10,
callbacks=[F1History(train=(x_train,y_train),validation=(x_val,y_val)),es])
output 打印:
Epoch 1/10
1/1 [==============================] - 0s 78ms/step - loss: 0.7453 - F1_score_train: 0.3478 - F1_score_val: 0.4762
Epoch 2/10
1/1 [==============================] - 0s 57ms/step - loss: 0.7448 - F1_score_train: 0.3478 - F1_score_val: 0.4762
Epoch 3/10
1/1 [==============================] - 0s 58ms/step - loss: 0.7444 - F1_score_train: 0.3478 - F1_score_val: 0.4762
Epoch 4/10
1/1 [==============================] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.7439Restoring model weights from the end of the best epoch.
1/1 [==============================] - 0s 70ms/step - loss: 0.7439 - F1_score_train: 0.3478 - F1_score_val: 0.4762
我有 TF 2.2 并且可以正常工作,希望对您有所帮助
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.